The worst a cat can do to in normal circumstances is leave cute little muddy cat prints - annoying but not inherently damaging.
This article is Copyright © Victoria Chapman, BSc, Paint Technologist
| Cats can't scratch cars! | for everyone |
Dawn fell off the fridge yesterday. My fault, because I disturbed her by opened the freezer door. She got up and placed her back paw where the door was supposed to be... lost her balance and started sliding down back first and desperately trying to cling to the top of the fridge with her front paws. Her claws are long and sharp.. not trimmed!
Out of curiosity I checked the fridge... not a single scratch in the smooth and shiny surface! So don't tell me cats can scratch cars!
By the way, Dawn is fine. I managed to slow her slide a little by pressing my body against her... could probably have grabbed her by the front paws but that might have injured her as she is a heavyweight!
| ||||||||

The quick answer is that car duco - if its in half decent condition - is extremely hard (its baked for at least half an hour at over 300º since it has to withstand road gravel hitting it etc). And cats claws are the same hardness as our fingernails. So unless you can scratch off the paint with your fingernail, there is *no way* a cat can scratch the *paint* of the surface of a car that's in a fairly good condition. (Paint does weather though and if its in a really bad state, it can be scratched, but if its that bad it should be a funny colour of white and be in the junk yard).
However, if the car has been *waxed*, the cat's claws (and your fingernails) can remove some of the wax, leaving what looks likes scratches in the paint, but are in fact just places where the surface of the wax has been removed. But then again a cat just walking across a car doesn't *use* claws, so the only way that the cat could scratch the car is if it was trying to somehow get traction on the surface, by either falling off or (dare I say) running for its life.
The worst a cat can do to in normal circumstances is leave cute little muddy cat prints - annoying but not inherently damaging.
This article is Copyright © Victoria Chapman, BSc, Paint Technologist,| The Electric New Paper : |
| Cats are not a traffic hazard |
| SEVERAL cat carers who are involved with the community cats in Jalan Pemimpin have sent e-mail messages expressing their distress with the coverage of the traffic situation along this road (‘Cars along Jalan Pemimpin swerve dangerously to dodge cats’, The New Paper on Sunday, 20 Jul). |
| 27 July 2008 |
| SEVERAL cat carers who are involved with the community cats in Jalan Pemimpin have sent e-mail messages expressing their distress with the coverage of the traffic situation along this road (’Cars along Jalan Pemimpin swerve dangerously to dodge cats’, The New Paper on Sunday, 20 Jul). I thought the coverage of the benefits of sterilisation programmes in which cats are neutered and then returned to their community was good (however, it was negated by the ‘catch-a-cat’ programme mentioned by the Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority). At any rate, no one should be going so quickly down any street that they cannot keep a proper lookout and react to whatever comes into their path. It could be a cat or a child or an old person or someone who has tripped over something in the pathway or a bicyclist. Cats are not a traffic hazard. Inattentive drivers are. And while no one can predict what they can do in any given situation, we must adopt a defensive attitude. Don’t think ‘if’ – think ‘when’. Joanna Hughes |
| |


IN HIS letter, 'Why kill a cat over scratches on car?' (The New Paper, 6 Jun), Dr Tan Chek Wee trivialised a woman's demands for the town council to cull cats that could scratch her car.
Dr Tan said 'the car has no feelings' and belittled the fears of the proud owner of the expensive new vehicle.
Cats and cars are not always compatible, though I love both.
I fully understand why the woman rejected the offer of a free car cover from the Cat Welfare Society.
I speak from experience in saying that while cats make only superficial scratches on paintwork, their claw sharpening on the rubber surrounds of windscreens can cause damage costing several hundred dollars.
If those claws go through the fabric top of a European convertible, the bill can run into five figures.
To protect one of our cars from our own cats, my wife has to cover it every time after use. This job is tough.
To prevent car covers from sticking to paintwork, you have to wait for the engine to cool. To avoid the accumulation of sand that causes scratches, covers should not touch the ground. Handling these unwieldy expanses of fabric is best done by two people, with space to walk round the vehicle. Covers also require laundering, and space to be hung to dry.
We go through this trouble only because we are retired, love cats and seldom use that car.
Can you imagine someone indifferent towards cats, whose car is used daily, wanting to do this?
Dr Tan concluded by saying that the solution is obvious for reconciling people's love for their possessions with understanding that cats are living beings too.
Practical solution
Rather than pondering the vague abstractions of anti-materialism, forgiveness and respect for life, Singaporeans should try to achieve one practical solution towards these ideals.
Persuade the HDB to repeal the archaic rule banning the keeping of cats in its flats.
Easing the ban will immediately resolve many conflicts.
Those claiming to love cats will then have to accept the responsibility of keeping them at home. This will confine the problems of food messes, urination, defecation and damage to property within their own premises.
The National Environment Agency, Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority and town council staff will have far fewer complaints to attend to.
More cat lovers should let the HDB know their feelings now.


The incident happened at about 6pm yesterday, near block 74 at Commonwealth Drive.
David Zhang, 50, a shopowner, told Shin Min Daily that he was in his shop when he heard a loud crack that sounded like thunder.
According to David, the tree was about 40 years old and a few branches had fallen off in the past few days after heavy rain. Fortunately, no one was hurt.
One of the car owners, 53-year-old Mr Xu, said that he had just stepped out of the car to place a soccer bet. Before he could place his bet, he heard the crack, and saw the tree trunk fall and land on his car.
Shin Min reports that the bonnets on both cars were seriously dented, and their windshields were shattered.
| Photo: A tree fell on two cars near Commonwealth Drive, Shin Min Daily |
In addition, the tree was near a playground but fortunately no children were there when the tree fell.
Replicated here, is an excerpt of an email that I have sent in response to a complainant.
"I have checked with a vet and our conclusion that cats are not able to make such deep scratches with their claws - which are actually the same hardness as human fingernails.
We have tried to scratch the paint off my own car but no mark could be made at all.
Here are 2 links on YouTube that shows that cat claws are unable to scratch car paint.
#1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omumunklRfA >>> showing a cat walking and then jumping off a silver car, leaving no marks
#2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqini0B7hIQ >>> showing a cat trying very hard to scratch a car windscreen but the claws just kept sliding off, but also left no marks. It also shows how a cat scratches (with straight and short strokes, in one direction usually).
This link http://www.flippyscatpage.com/carpaint.html >>> is also consistent with our views that, car paint has been baked and etc, so should be able to withstand gravel hitting the car during road driving (which happens at higher speed and G-forces at work).
The marks on your car paint are irregular and originate from different directions, 1 scratch at a time (a cat is unable to extend just 1 claw, unlike humans who can extend our individual fingers). The scratches are also too deep for the regular street cat which weighs under 5kg.
We sincerely concluded that the deep scratches on your car has been caused by a sharp metal object, like car keys or the like.
Lastly, parking our cars at a public HDB carpark means that it is down to "Park at your own risk", I am also exasperated for people opening their car doors and banging into my car, leaving dents.
Nevertheless, I would still like to offer you a car cover which may prevent future issues like this. If you are willing to accept the car cover, I am willing to meet you up.
Thank you for your great patience and understanding for this matter."
What else can I say? Of course, it is still POSSIBLE that cats might scratch your car, but it is highly unlikely, given the paint quality of cars nowadays. Now, that is a tricky issue.
This topic just keeps coming up over and over. I think one reason is really that in Singapore cars are just so overpriced. If you are overseas, and your brand new car costs $10,000, I think people are a lot less uptight. I know for example, an American friend of mine thinks it's really funny that Singaporeans get so uptight that their bumpers get scratched. He looked at me and said that bumpers were there to be bumped into so your CAR doesn't get damaged. And I am always taken aback with how people back into a space and bump the cars a little to make space for your car when parallel parking.
Here's the thing though - cars do cost a lot of money here and no one likes to see their cars scratched, but why do people always blame the cats? If you see a cat on your car, why do people immediately deduce the cat must be scratching their car? Most people with some knowledge of cats know for example, that cats don't scratch on smooth surfaces. Also, cats have retractable claws and their claws aren't strong enough to scrape off paint in general (just as your fingernails aren't able to). Now I know that this is something that most people with no knowledge of cats don't know, but it's worrying that people are asking for cats to be removed just because the cat is in the vicinity. So the cat who is on the car for a bit of warmth gets hauled off and killed because the owner of the car happens to have noticed a scratch on his or her car. Or maybe not even THAT cat - because it's not as if most people have any idea which cat it is. In fact it's not as if most people even see the cat cause the scratch. Short of sitting there with your eye trained on the car 24 hours a day how can you be sure it was the cat or any cat for that matter? So let's just grab ALL the cats in the carpark to be safe and kill them all, so that we don't have the sliver of a chance that a cat MIGHT be sitting on your car and hence POSSIBLY scratching your car.
But it doesn't work that way.
New cats move in due to the vacuum effect. The car owner is still unhappy. The caregivers get discouraged and wonder why they are trying to keep the population in check through sterilisation and often give up sterilising so in fact now there are more cats then ever before.
It doesn't mean if you're a car owner, there is no solution. Caregivers are always willing to work with you to solve the problem. The cat may be moved away from the area if we know which cat it is. I have bought car covers and given them to people even in cases where there was no proof it WAS the cat. If the car is covered, the cat cannot scratch it. But again, this is too difficult for some people to do, or they don't want people to think they're putting on airs. Either the car means a lot to you (in which case why be embarrassed about it?) so use the cover, or it doesn't because you can't be bothered to use the cover, in which case why are the scratches bothering you so much?
We live in a city. We drive with other cars on the road. There are BOUND to be scratches, scrapes and even dents or bang ups. Last year in an incident which I blogged about, I came back to see a car that had been really badly dented by a van driver who happily drove off even though I am fairly certain he knew what had happened (the police later called me up for my statement because I waited for the car owner to come back and told him what happened).
So what should we do? Ban vans? Ban every car on the road? Ban other drivers? Because that's the only way to ensure that a car is 'safe'.
At the end of the day, it's a car. The minute you drive it out of the showroom, it's already dropping rapidly in value. In a few years, it's just worth scrap metal, if you're lucky. Who are we preserving this car for by ensuring its in pristine condition? For the next owner after you? For the scrap metal yard? To show off to other people?
Things get old. Things get used and they're not shiny or pretty any more. But for a thing to be worth more than a life - that's just sad.